• 哲學公理思辨社｜The Axiomatic Philosophy Forum

  【版規】哲學公理思辨社 — 論壇規則與發帖指南

  Posted by 穹 許 on 2025年9月5日 at am10:24

  <b style=”font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;”>🏛️ 哲學公理思辨社｜論壇規則貼文

  The Axiomatic Philosophy Forum – Forum Rules

  歡迎加入 哲學公理思辨社！
  本論壇致力於成為 高質量哲學思辨平台，提供理性、嚴謹且建設性的討論空間。

  All members must adhere to the following rules when posting and participating in discussions to maintain the integrity and efficiency of this forum.

  <hr>

  📌 1️⃣ 基本原則 / Fundamental Principles✔️ 理性與嚴謹 / Rationality & Rigor

  ✅ 所有討論必須基於嚴密的邏輯論證和清晰概念定義
  ✅ 避免個人情緒、信仰式陳述或無論據的斷言
  / All discussions must be based on rigorous logical argumentation and clear conceptual definitions. Avoid emotional statements, dogmatic assertions, or claims without substantiation.

  ✔️ 公理為本 / Axiom-Centric

  ✅ 核心討論應圍繞哲學或邏輯公理及其推論關係
  ✅ 所有論點須可回溯至特定公理進行檢視
  / Core discussions should revolve around fundamental axioms in philosophy and logic, their derivations, and interrelationships.

  ✔️ 互相尊重 / Mutual Respect

  ✅ 尊重不同哲學立場與觀點
  ✅ 辯論針對事不針對人，避免人身攻擊或嘲諷
  / Respect different philosophical stances. Focus debates on ideas, not individuals, avoiding personal attacks or mockery.

  ✔️ 促進深度交流 / Promoting In-Depth Exchange

  ✅ 鼓勵提出有價值的問題、分享獨到見解
  ✅ 避免淺薄評論或簡單「我同意/我不同意」
  / Encourage valuable questions, unique insights, and constructive dialogue. Avoid superficial comments or simple “I agree/I disagree.”

  <hr>

  📌 2️⃣ 發帖格式要求 / Posting Format Requirements

  為確保內容清晰、易讀與可檢索，請遵循以下格式：

  🔹 標題 / Title

  應精確概括核心議題，建議包含所探討的公理或概念
  / Should precisely summarize the core topic, preferably including the axiom or concept being discussed.
  範例 / Example:

  • [邏輯學] 探討歸納法在科學發現中的公理地位與界限

  • [Logic] The Axiomatic Status and Limits of Induction in Scientific Discovery

  🔹 分類標籤 / Category Tags

  每帖選擇相關標籤，如 [形上學], [知識論], [邏輯學], [心靈哲學], [語言哲學] 等
  / Each post should select one or more relevant tags, e.g., [Metaphysics], [Epistemology], [Logic], [Philosophy of Mind], [Philosophy of Language]

  🔹 引言/背景 / Introduction & Context

  簡要介紹所討論的哲學公理或概念，提供必要背景信息
  / Briefly introduce the philosophical axiom or concept and provide necessary background information

  🔹 論點闡述 / Argumentation

  清晰提出核心論點或哲學問題
  使用分點、段落或小標題使內容條理分明
  / Clearly state your core argument or philosophical question using bullet points, paragraphs, or subheadings

  🔹 論證與哲學依據 / Philosophical Basis & Substantiation

  引用哲學家觀點、經典著作或思想實驗支持論點
  註明來源（作者、著作名、章節）
  / Cite relevant philosophers, classic works, or thought experiments. Include author, work title, and chapter where possible

  🔹 分析與反思 / Analysis & Reflection

  基於論證進行深入分析，提出批判性反思或新見解
  / Conduct in-depth analysis and offer critical reflection or new insight

  🔹 總結 / Conclusion

  簡要總結主要發現或論點，可提出開放性問題以鼓勵討論
  / Briefly summarize main findings or arguments and pose open-ended questions to encourage discussion

  <hr>

  ⚠️ 3️⃣ 違規處理機制 / Violation Protocol

  1️⃣ 第一次違規 → 警告 ⚠️ / First warning
  2️⃣ 第二次違規 → 禁言 7 日 ⏸️ / 7-day temporary suspension
  3️⃣ 第三次違規 → 永久移除 ⛔ / Permanent removal

  嚴重違規（如人身攻擊或散布不實資訊）將直接永久移除
  / Severe violations, such as personal attacks or spreading misinformation, result in immediate permanent removal

  <hr>

  📚 4️⃣ 附錄 / Sample Rules

  1. 所有討論須基於邏輯、公理與理性分析 🧠 / All discussions must be grounded in logic, axioms, and rational analysis

  2. 發帖格式需遵循標題、標籤、引言、論點、論證、分析、總結的結構 📝 / Follow the posting structure: Title, Tags, Introduction, Argumentation, Substantiation, Analysis, Conclusion

  3. 尊重他人觀點，禁止人身攻擊或嘲諷 🛑 / Respect others’ viewpoints; no personal attacks or mockery

  4. 鼓勵建設性問題與深入討論 💡 / Encourage constructive questions and in-depth discussion

  5. 違規三次將被永久移除 ⛔ / Three violations result in permanent removal

  <hr>

  • This discussion was modified 2 months, 3 weeks ago by  穹 許.
  • This discussion was modified 2 months, 3 weeks ago by  穹 許.

  穹 許 replied 2 months, 3 weeks ago 1 Member · 0 Replies
• 0 Replies

Log In to Reply